![]() first level review, second level review, QC review, attorney level review). In other words, how in-depth does the analysis of the data need to be for this particular matter? Will there be different review teams with different tasks? (i.e. How many reviewers will there be and what level of review needs to be performed? Is it a standard document review for production? Is it a review for an investigation? Is the case team reviewing for privilege? Is the case team preparing for depositions or preparing witnesses and experts? The overall end-goal for the document review being performed will determine the workflows legal teams will need to set up.ģ. What is the overall goal or objective for this review? This is a much more cost-effective and efficient approach.Ģ. Tip: Start with native review, and only request responsive images (and/or redacted documents). Now that data volumes have increased significantly, this practice has become outdated and costly. Imaging all ESI prior to document review used to be a fairly standard practice. Imaging has become a means of consistently “preserving” the formatting of a native files. The process of converting ESI to image format for review is considered image review. Page counts can change from computer to computer, which is one of the many reasons legal teams choose to convert ESI to image format. Individual computer settings will determine page counts when a file is opened in its native source application. Native files do not have set page counts. This common misconception about PDF files has been known to cause challenges during review and/or production. ![]() It is important to note that PDF files are considered native files by almost all litigation review platforms, not images. End-users can view native file content in one single platform, without having to launch the original source file application. Almost all software companies develop their applications and native file viewers around other technologies (ex. Native review is the review of ESI content in its current native source format. This is particularly important when it comes to tasks, such as printing. You need to know the difference between native file and image review functionality in your chosen review platform. The capabilities used depend on the type of document review being performed. Litigation review platforms have different functionalities available to reviewers. Is “native review” or “image review” being performed? Here are 9 key points all legal teams should consider prior to starting the document review process:ġ. This can add additional expenses and lengthy delays to the review. However, too many case teams ignore expert advice and take perceived “shortcuts” to the process. If you are aware of the complexities involved in the document review process, then it will be easier to avoid common pitfalls. But do you know how to prepare for a review before it begins? To make a document review successful, it’s important to proactively prepare your workflow and stick to guidelines that can inform and expedite your process. Many people understand what document review is and when it needs to be performed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |